Prepositional Phrases Sentence Building Exercise

In this exercise, you will continue to apply the basic strategies outlined in Introduction to Sentence Combining.  Combine the sentences in each set into a single clear sentence containing at least one prepositional phrase. Omit words that are needlessly repeated, but dont leave out any important details.   After you have completed the exercise, compare your new sentences with the original sentences on page two. Keep in mind that many combinations are possible, and in some cases, you may prefer your own sentences to the original versions. A mouse darted.It darted across the salad bar.This happened during the luncheon.We traveled this summer.We traveled by train.We traveled from Biloxi.We traveled to Dubuque.The convertible swerved, crashed, and caromed.It swerved off the road.It crashed through the guardrail.It caromed off a maple tree.Mick planted seeds.He planted them in his garden.He did this after the quarrel.The quarrel was with Mr. Jimmy.Grandpa dropped his teeth.His teeth were false.His teeth dropped into a glass.There was prune juice in the glass.Lucy played.She was behind the sofa.She was with her friend.Her friend was imaginary.They played for hours.There was a man.He wore a chicken costume.He dashed across the field.He did this before the ballgame.The ballgame was on Sunday afternoon.A man stood, looking down.He stood upon a railroad bridge.The bridge was in northern Alabama.He was looking down into the water.The water was twenty feet below.The water was swift.The gray-flannel fog closed off the Salinas Val ley.It was the fog of winter.The fog was high.The Salinas Valley was closed off from the sky.And the Salinas Valley was closed off from all the rest of the world.I climbed to my perch.I did this one night.The night was hot.The night was in the summer.The night was in 1949.It was my usual perch.My perch was in the press box.The press box was cramped.The press box was above the stands.The stands were wooden.These were the stands of the baseball park.The baseball park was in Lumberton, North Carolina. After you have completed the sentence building  exercise on  page one, compare your new sentences with the sample combinations below. Keep in mind that many combinations are possible, and in some  cases, you may prefer your own sentences to the original versions. Sample Combinations During the luncheon, a mouse darted across the salad bar.This summer we traveled by train from Biloxi to Dubuque.The convertible swerved off the road, crashed through the guardrail, and caromed off a maple tree.After his quarrel with Mr. Jimmy, Mick planted seeds in his garden.Grandpa dropped his false teeth into a glass of prune juice.Lucy played  behind  the couch for hours with her imaginary friend.Before the ballgame on Sunday afternoon, a man in a chicken costume dashed across the field.A man stood upon a railroad bridge in northern Alabama, looking down into the swift waters twenty feet below.​  (Ambrose Bierce, An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge)The high gray-flannel fog of winter closed off the Salinas Valley from the sky and from all the rest of the world. (John Steinbeck, The Chrysanthemums)One hot night in the summer of 1949, I climbed to my usual perch in the cramped press box above the wooden stands of the baseball park in Lumberton, North Carolina.  (Tom W icker, Baseball)

Criminology, Crj 3680 Your Theory Of Crime - 1689 Words

Patricia C. Bà ¡ez Solivà ¡n April 19, 2016 Criminology, CRJ 3680 Your Theory of Criminality Social process theory and more Crime comes in all shapes and forms. Some people define crime as breaking the rules defined by society; other people define it as breaking the laws established by society. The key difference in this assertion is that rules like General Douglas Mac Arthur said are meant to be broken, but the law is not, which creates a society in distress. Living in these huge cities, it would probably be expected for things to be different and maybe even better, but the truth is that is not†¦show more content†¦It is believed that sometimes human beings commit a crime because they have so much more to win, than to lose. They do not see crime as a prohibited act by the â€Å"law of the land†, and something considered serious to search for a penalty and punishment (Darrow, 1922). Nowadays, individuals commit crime because the judicial system is not as strong as it should be. The criminal justice system has loopholes that are needed to be fixed; changes are needed to be made human beings have to stop creating a society of criminals whom have no respect of a punishable government. Because an uneasiness toward â€Å"crime has probably been around as long as crime itself† (Schneider et al., 2007). Individuals act the way they do because society holds them down, and because of that they become rebels trying to make their voices be heard, and to feel some kind of relief from the guilt of not having control over situation. There are no ways to justify a crime, but a criminal seems to commit a crime to feel a boost of satisfaction in their system. The criminal defines crime as â€Å"an attack on an anonymous victim, committed with accomplices, prepared and motivated by a mixture of utilitarianism and hedonism...† (Le Blanc et al., 1989). The primary cause of violence comes from the regulations society lays on us. Freud, in his book called Civilization and Its Discontents, establishes that there are 3 sources for humans to suffer from: The power of nature, the expiration of our

Educational Psychology for Growth and Developmental Process

Question: Discuss about theEducational Psychology for Growth and Developmental Process. Answer: The development theories are based on the various stages of the development of a child. It is argued that although every child is unique, their growth and developmental process are considered universal based on the various principles like cephalocaudal principle, proximodistal principle and maturation. Developmental theories help adults to assess the stages or sequence of development taking place in children along with their integration of many abilities that he/she will in due course of time. Developmental theories are also crucial in the domain of teaching and training children so as to understand their powers (Demetriou et al., 2016). There are several theories and ideas suggested by many scientists and behaviourists. There are different kinds of views about how a person develops physically as well as psychologically throughout the lifespan of the individual. Social learning theories are based on the learning of the human beings depending on what the human beings learn from the so ciety, it is often said to bridge the gap between the behaviorist and the cognitive learning theories. This essay will discuss about two theories, the Cognitive Developmental theory by Jean Piaget and the Social Learning theory by Albert Bandura. The Cognitive Developmental theory proposed by Jean Piaget suggests and explains the ways in which the children make up their minds about the world. Some of the other influential theories interrelated with cognitive theories are Socio-cultural theories, care-knowledge theories and information-processing theories. He did not believe in the idea that intelligence is fixed trait and he explained that development occurs in an individual when that person develops biologically and interacts with the environment or the society (Illeris, 2018). His theory deals with the complex understanding of infant cognitive skills, language development in children, reasoning involving mathematics and science as well as moral development. A thorough understanding of his theories promotes understanding of children in adults that would motivate a faster learning session for the children (Demetriou et al., 2016). Furthermore, the learning theories are truly interesting in their demonstration of how human bei ngs process their mental activities and perform abstract symbolic reasoning. The theory can be used by the parent to support the growth of their children, by the teachers to determine the abilities of the students and can be used by the parent to support the growth of their children (Taylor, 2017). As a part of his career, he was employed to translate English intelligence question papers into French, while working there he became interested in the answers provided by the children and why they marked the wrong answers, he believed that this was the chief difference between the children and adults. According to his theory there are four stages of cognitive development in an individual, sensorimotor stage which occurs from birth to 18 to 24 months, preoperational stage which occurs from 18-24 months and continues up to early stages of childhood. Concrete operational, this stages occur among the children aged 7 to 12 months and formal operational which indicates the journey from adolescence to adulthood. He was the first psychologist to develop a systematic study of the cognitive development in human beings (Gray MacBlain, 2015). His studies included the cognitive developmental stages in a child, the detailed descriptions of detection of cognition in children. He also developed si mple tests to determine the different levels of cognitive development in children. Piaget did not want to measure the efficiency of the children related with their counting abilities, spelling check or determining their I.Q. (Hartley Ho, 2015). Before the research, done by Piaget everyone believed that children were stupid than the adults, but Piaget proved that children have unique intelligence and their way of thinking is strikingly different from that of the adults. Piagets theory is considered to be a major breakthrough as it helped in bringing a radical change in how people experience children. His theories emphasizes on fostering a better understanding of the children to facilitate their learning process. Coming to the Social development theory of Bandura, this theory is somewhat similar to the behaviorist theory and agrees with classical as well as operant conditioning. According to his theory children learns from their own environment, the people from whom they learn from are called models and there are many models whom the children follow and they also imitate their behaviour and actions (Bandura, 2014). The children observe and learn according to their respective role models and they imitate different types of behavior such as masculine, feminine, anti social and others. The children give attention to these models and imitate their behavior which they have observed, they do not think whether their behavior is appropriate for their gender or not, but they learn from the society and start imitating those gender which are appropriate for their gender. At first, the child will try to imitate those people who will seem to be similar to them and most likely is that they will imitate tho se people who will be closer to their gender. Secondly, a child will respond to the stimuli they receive from their environment (Olson, 2016). For example if a child does something good the parents or others appreciate him/her, in this way they learn that they are doing something right and continue doing so. Moreover according to Bandura, a childs satisfaction, sense of accomplishment and pride plays a huge role in their learning and behavior. According to him intrinsic reinforcement or internal reward has a substantial role to plan instigating children to faster learning. Banduras stress on the internal reinforcement apart from the external factor emphasizes the complicated nature in understanding childrens learning process. In understanding social learning theory it s also essential to consider that learning does not induce a change in behavior amongst the children. His observations are in stark contrast to the Behaviorist notion that emphasizes learning leads to a permanent chang e in behavior. To compare both the theories the cognitive development theory by Piaget is depends on the biological factors, which contribute toward the growth of a person and the social developmental theory by Bandura. The cognitive theory by Piaget tries to find out how the human beings are able to process the various mental activities. Piaget was interested to know how the human beings understand things or gather information. According to him, the chief difference between humans and other creatures is that the humans are able to make out an abstract meaning or find out reason in things. While working with Binet and studying the knowledge ability of young children he observed that every child had a different thought process and they did not answer in the same way as their peers (Fu Hwang, 2018). He theory developed by Piaget focuses more on the ability of the human beings to process the information they receive and the reasoning capability, the social learning theory by Bandura studies the relat ionships of one human with another and how the society teach individuals. Bandura tried to find out link between three things, the psychological process of a person, the behavior of the person and the link between the person and the environment. Bandura is considered to be the father of the cognitivists movement. Both the theories rely somewhat on behaviorism, as they both believed that the environment of a person hugely affects the person in various phases of his/her life (Esmaeili, Tafti, 2016). Piaget was a biologist and he was interested in understanding the way in which a biological organism functions. Bandura stresses that behavior stems from the environment round the individual through the process of observational learning and taking into considerations minute details surrounding the individual. A major chunk of this learning, according to Bandura, includes the process of encoding the behavior of people. Children therefore learn through acute observational process try to imitate these behaviors. If the satisfaction on doing the same is rewarding th ey most likely will repeat the behavior.Behavior is controlled with the help of mental states called schemes an individual utilizes these schemes to designate actions in the world. In the social learning theory according Akin, in the experimental method, the standard procedure is to manipulate one variable, and then measure its effects on another. All this boils down to a theory of personality that says that ones environment causes ones behavior (Strauss, 2017). Thereby proving to the assertion that both theories have a bearing on behaviorism. Both the social learning theory and cognitive theory involve some stages which can be followed. Thus to conclude, this can be said that the two theories have a lot in common and are different in other ways as well, but both the social learning theory and the cognitive developmental theory the human beings learn from their environment adapting with the behavior of the people around them as well as taking note of their attitudes and behavior. The theories make people understand how people learn through observation and imitation. Learning theories therefore help people to possess a constructive idea of how they perceive the world around them. Reference List Bandura, A. (2014). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. InHandbook of moral behavior and development(pp. 69-128). Psychology Press. Demetriou, A., Shayer, M., Efklides, A. (Eds.). (2016).Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development: Implications and applications for education. Routledge. Esmaeili, N., Tafti, M. A. (2016). how to learn: identify key factors in learning process from the perspective of different instructors and their learners.iioab journal,7, 171-179. Fu, Q. K., Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016.Computers Education. Gray, C., MacBlain, S. (2015).Learning theories in childhood. Sage. Hartley, J., Ho, Y. S. (2015). Classic Papers in Psychology: From Theory to Practice.Psychology Teaching Review,21(1), 73-75. Illeris, K. (2018). An overview of the history of learning theory.European Journal of Education,53(1), 86-101. Jose, S., Patrick, P. G., Moseley, C. (2017). Experiential learning theory: the importance of outdoor classrooms in environmental education.International Journal of Science Education, Part B,7(3), 269-284. Meltzer, L. (Ed.). (2018).Executive function in education: From theory to practice. Guilford Publications. Olson, M. (2016). PSY3410-01. Theories of Learning. F16. Olson, Matthew. Resnick, L. B. (2017). Toward a cognitive theory of instruction. InLearning and motivation in the classroom(pp. 5-38). Routledge. Strauss, A. L. (2017).Psychological modeling: Conflicting theories. Routledge. Taylor, E. W. (2017). Transformative learning theory. InTransformative Learning Meets Bildung(pp. 17-29). SensePublishers, Rotterdam.

Interesting place free essay sample

If you believed the house you were living in was haunted would you flee town or would you try to accommodate your house for your ghostly guest? Me myself I would run and never come back, however one woman by the name of Sarah Winchester decided that she would provide accommodation for her ghostly visitors in her whole seven story mansion. Back when I was in middle school me and my grandma was watching the discovery channel and a piece came on in which they were talking about this bizarre mystery house, we were living in the bay area at the time and my grandma became very interested they were now doing tours of the house in San Jose California and she wanted to take me and my mom. The house was rumored to be haunted so I didn’t really want any parts of that trip, I ended up getting fooled into taking the trip anyway. We will write a custom essay sample on Interesting place or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This was by far the most bizarre place I have ever been too. Before I talk about my trip however I should give you a little history lesson on who Sarah Winchester was. The Winchester mystery house is a mansion in San Jose California; it was once the personal residence Of Sarah Winchester the widow of the gun making tycoon William Wirt Winchester. Winchester rifles were known as the â€Å"guns that won the west†. Sarah and William Winchester had first lived in Boston in the late 1800’s, their only child died as an infant and not long after Sarah Winchesters husband William had died of a sickness. As you can imagine Sarah Winchester went into a deep depression. She kept to herself and she became very interested in the spirit world, In fact she believed that ghost had killed both her husband and her daughter. Now to start with the creepy stuff, legend says during a seance she communicated with her husband on the â€Å"other side† when I say other side I mean she was talking to her dead husband William Winchester. During their â€Å"talk† he gave her some advice on how to protect herself from the evil spirits of American Indians, Civil War soldiers and others killed by Winchester rifles that took the lives of both him and their daughter. During their talk her husband instructed her to move west and make a house that would accommodate for the spirits. Here’s the trippy part as long as construction of the house never ceased Sarah Winchester could rest assured that her life was not in danger. So move west she did she found an old farm house and turned it into a mansion, the house was continually being constructed on in fact there were changes made to the house every single day for 38 years until the day she died. Of course money was no issue to Mrs. Winchester the rifle business had her pretty much rich forever, during the tour I remember the tour guide saying she made around a thousand dollars a day, so the cost of construction was really no issue. This woman may have been crazy but she had very exquisite taste, her house was very beautiful, bizarre but very beautiful. The was mahogany and marble everywhere, statues, a ballroom and 3 elevators, even a elevator that moved horizontally instead of vertically, different right? But there are reasons for everything this woman did to her house as I found out during the tour of the house. The tour guide told us that she would leave it up to us to decide why Winchester really built the house in the manner she did, but if we really wanted to understand the bizarre in her then you would have to understand that Sarah Winchester believed spirits were always around her and she believed that she was in tune with the spirit world. She also told us to not stray away from the group or that we could get lost for hours. The house contains many features that were used to trap or confuse spirits. To get around the house you need a map, the house was big enough to be an apartment complex and was built very bizarrely. There were stairways that led to the ceiling, door that would open to brick walls or different staircases, in one case, while we were on the 3rd floor the tour guide opened a door that led to the outside air. There aren’t any mirrors in the huge mansion because Winchester believed ghosts were afraid of their own reflection. During the tour it got really creepy when the tour told us we were headed to the seance room and that it would take us about 10 to 15 minutes to get there. Sarah Winchester was very paranoid and she didn’t want any bad spirits to follow her to her private seance room, so the route to the room was like a maze. We would be walking through a to a door in the door in the middle of this hallway, open the door and it’s a widow to climb through that leads to a staircase that leads to another hallway. Suddenly during the tour I remember the tour guide saying â€Å"get ready for this†. She pushed a button and a panel flew back towards us she stepped on it and glided over from one side of the complex of her house another, after she waited for us too all glide over she opened a window in that side of the house and we all climbed through not to the open air but to another descending staircase that led to a door to a upwards stair case on the same level as before, all inside the house. Finally we got to a hallway that led to a door that was the seance room. We could not go into the room however in fact there were many rooms in the house that were not to be viewed by the public, that made things just that more creepy to me. Sarah Winchester was such a recluse that when the president of the United States Theodore â€Å"Teddy Roosevelt came to visit her mansion, no one opened the front door for her. In fact the very expensive mahogany door was only used once by Mrs. Winchester the day it was installed. Not much is known of this women because she kept to herself she moved away from her family and did not keep in contact with her , she didn’t even keep a journal so no one really knows what was going on in this woman’s head. That’s what makes it so interesting to me, creep and bizarre but by far the most interesting place I have ever been still.